I thoroughly enjoyed
Competition….!!!!
Humans and animals are genetically driven to compete for survival, thus making all social interaction “inherently” selfish, strictly in accordance to the theory of natural selection.
So, are altruism and morality artificial outgrowths of modern culture?
This leaves me inferring that even seemingly unselfish acts of altruism merely represent a species' strategy to survive and promote their interests. This presents an amusing paradigm for understanding sociality. Predominantly, theories in ethology concerning cooperative and altruistic behavior claim that social animals, including human and nonhuman primates, are cooperative and altruistic only if they have something to gain from their actions. It’s a part of our brain Chemistry. So far so good..."I’m loving it!"
But survival of the fittest is just a “part” of the story… How does one explain firefighters running into a burning building to save strangers at the possible expense of their own lives? There's no biological imperative for that. Instead of being genetically predisposed to competition and aggression, we have a biological foundation for unselfish social interaction. Now the more I think of this, the more boring it becomes. Perhaps, evolution is more about collaboration or symbiosis between organisms and species than it ever was about competition. Multicellularity, the eye, the brain, language, photosynthesis, the Archaeoptrix… I better stop listing…A study says humans derive pleasure from positive social interaction. And far from being inherently violent, humans demonstrate a natural abhorrence of violence and conflict. We have to train soldiers to kill. It's not instinctive. We are horrified by terrorism, that explains it all. Duh!
Probably “ It feels good to be nice”….shrugs a boooooored me!
9 comments:
your post is pointedly satirical, very very entertaining.you are the greatest, no doubt you have so many fans!;)
woh blog tha
ya kya tha??
hum ko tho ithna ki patha hain ki
jo b tha bahuth acha tha:-)
good work young lady ..
simply superb.!!
"This presents an amusing paradigm for understanding sociality."
Is it just for an effect you've used this or are you really understanding all that?ha ha.
In the words of a great scholar I've been fortunate to interact with-
"sinfully entertaining"- thats what your posts are, miss scholar.
You know who I am...sinfully entertaining is "our" word.
Truely Ingenius!Darwin's now history-You are the Present!
Koi shak nahi, tu na pagal ho gayi hai-chup chap match dekh ke so nahi sakhti? Stop reading all those stupid novels varna mental hospital mein barthi karna padega tujhe aur vahaan padne ke liye novels bhi nahi honge, soch ladki soch, kaise jiyegi tu?muhaha
very nice!!
dats wat is hapeening in 2days world u know S"URVIVAL OF THE FITTEST" aa world full of competition no time for breathing
no peace, no free time and life became very boring .. i feel the same way.
Well ... you see,Darwin, when propounded his theory..made an assumption that humans evovled from the apes and are a part of the evolution process.(which is very true)...but the fact remains that evolution causes great developments and now the "EVOLVED APES" are blessed with the amazing ability to think!!
"Survival of the Fittest"...its obvious that there cannot be any such a law!!(definitely not something that nature has ordained)...If that were true,then what abt the weak....where do they stand in this world??..Its obvious.. that they are not "EXTINCT".
I feel its all a matter of choice...every person in this world has to make a choice at some or the other time...When they are right,they are "STRONG"...and when wrong,"WEAK".... Now tell me how often do ppl end up making the right choice??
Every living being in this world deserves another chance to make a choice!!!!...and giving them their oppurtunity is what differentiates us from the "ANIMALS"!!!
Scientific theories gain validity over many number of years by accumulated evidence. Darwinism has stood up to this test and will stand as long as a better theory replaces it. Your view is more of anthropomorphic, and assumes that other species are concerned with issues such as "being social", while in reality these are abstarct concepts which have a meaning only in the realm of human understanding.
If you are so interested in gaining perspective on issues that you are actually referring to, then, Dawkin's book on gene as a unit of analysis is a good starting point. However, make sure you also read his second book, "the extended phenotype".
Human altriusm does seem contradictory to darwinistic ideas of survival of the fittest. Robert Axlerod has done some game theoretic work on such dynamics. There is also some work which shows that even animals in some contexts exibhit altruism, hinting that there is something more fundamental that is driving the dynamics of altruism.
Post a Comment